Finance and Fintech
Most business software can tolerate a rounding error or a retry that runs twice. Financial software cannot. Every rupee has to be traceable to the transaction that created it, every balance has to reconcile, and every access has to be on record. We build for that standard.
Teams who have built ecommerce or ERP systems often underestimate these. Each one changes the architecture rather than adding a feature.
Balances are derived from entries, never stored and updated. If a balance can be edited directly, it will be, and then nobody can explain it. Double entry is not accounting decoration, it is what makes the system provable.
Who did what, when, from where, and what the value was before. Corrections are new entries, never overwrites. This is what an auditor asks for first.
A retried payment request must not move money twice. Every transaction carries a key that makes repeating it safe. Systems without this lose real money in production.
Your records and the bank, the wallet and the acquirer will disagree. The system has to surface the difference each morning, not at month end when nobody can trace it.
Origination, credit scoring, disbursement, repayment schedules, delinquency tracking and collections. Including instalment structures and recovery workflows as they are actually run here.
Group formation, joint liability, field officer apps that work offline in the field, and cash collection recorded at the point of collection rather than in the evening from memory.
Wallet ledgers, transfers, merchant settlement and integration with local rails. Built so that a failed leg leaves the books balanced rather than half moved.
Identity capture, document verification, risk scoring and the screening steps your compliance team needs, with every decision recorded and reviewable.
Reports produced from the ledger rather than assembled by hand in a spreadsheet each quarter. When the format changes, the report changes, not your month.
Reconciliation, suspense management, fee and commission calculation, and the operational screens the finance team actually lives in.
Licensing categories, permitted activities and reporting obligations shape what you can build and when you can launch. Confirm the current position with your compliance advisors early, because it usually decides the sequence of the project.
Collections happen in cash, in the field, by people. A system that assumes every movement is digital does not match the operation and gets worked around within weeks.
Field officers lose signal. Offline capture with reliable synchronisation is a hard requirement for anything that leaves an office, and it is real engineering rather than a setting.
Verification integrations involve commercial onboarding as well as code. Start the paperwork in week one, because approval time routinely exceeds development time.
Before any screen, we agree the ledger: what accounts exist, what entries each event creates, and what must always balance. Getting this wrong is the one mistake that cannot be refactored cheaply.
Timeouts, partial failures, duplicate callbacks, reversals. In financial software these are the product, not edge cases handled later.
Concurrent transfers on one balance, replayed requests, a settlement file arriving twice. If the books stay correct through those, they will survive production.
Before launch, not after an incident. Access control, secrets handling, data at rest and the audit trail itself.
Five to nine months for a first production release covering one product line, including reconciliation and reporting. Compliance review and third party onboarding often run alongside and sometimes set the date.
Usually yes, and the answer depends entirely on what that system exposes. Tell us which one and we will give you a straight answer rather than a general one.
No. Licensing and compliance sit with you and your advisors. We build so that the reporting and controls they require are produced by the system rather than assembled by hand.
We build to the controls your auditors will test and arrange independent review before launch. Formal certification is a separate engagement with a certifying body.
Yes, and you should. One product, one channel, real transactions, then expand. A narrow live system teaches you more in a month than a large specification does in six.
Where it comes in, who touches it, what it has to reconcile against, and who audits it. That is enough for us to tell you what the build involves and what it will cost.