Complaint Management System

Every complaint logged, routed and closed on the record

Ezitech Complaint Management pulls every channel into one queue, routes each issue to the person who can actually fix it, holds an SLA clock over it, and leaves an audit trail a regulator or a board will accept.

  • Every channel into one queue
  • SLA clocks that escalate themselves
  • Root cause recorded, not just the fix
Ezitech Complaints · Service desk
Open tickets
218
▼ 31 this week
Within SLA
91.4%
▲ 3.2 points
Breach risk
17
within 4 hours
Received vs resolvedLast 9 weeks
#4471 · Billing disputeTier 2 · 6h leftIn progress
#4468 · Service outage40 min leftEscalated
#4455 · Delivery delayResolved in 4hClosed
SLA clockrunning on every ticket
Auto-routedto the team that can fix it

Running in banks, telecoms, utilities, hospitals, government departments and service businesses

LOGO
LOGO
LOGO
LOGO
LOGO
The problem

Complaints don’t damage a business. Unanswered ones do.

The complaint that reaches a regulator is rarely the worst one you received. It’s the one nobody replied to.

01

Every channel is its own island

A complaint arrives by phone, email, Facebook, WhatsApp and a walk-in. That’s five queues, five owners, and one increasingly angry customer telling the same story five times.

02

The clock starts when somebody notices

Without an SLA that runs on its own, urgency depends entirely on who happened to read the message and how busy their morning was.

03

The same complaint keeps coming back

Tickets get closed without a cause being recorded, so nothing upstream ever changes and next month’s queue fills up with the same three problems.

One queue, one clock, one record per complaint.

Every channel feeds a single queue. Each ticket is categorised, routed to the team that can actually resolve it, and placed under an SLA clock that escalates without being asked. Closure requires a root cause. Which is what turns a service desk into a diagnostic instrument instead of a treadmill.

Explore the modules
Modules

Nine modules from first contact to corrective action

Intake, routing and SLA are the working core. Root cause and quality reporting are what stop the queue refilling.

Omnichannel Intake

Phone, email, web form, WhatsApp, SMS, social media and walk-ins all creating tickets in one queue, with duplicates merged against the same customer.

  • Email & web
  • WhatsApp
  • Social
  • Walk-in
  • Deduplication

Categorisation & Routing

Rules that read category, product, region and severity and send a ticket to the right team first time, instead of after two hand-offs and a day lost.

  • Auto-categorise
  • Skill routing
  • Region rules
  • Round robin

SLA & Escalation

Response and resolution clocks per category and priority, pausing while you legitimately wait on the customer, escalating before a breach rather than reporting it after.

  • Response SLA
  • Resolution SLA
  • Pause rules
  • Auto-escalate

Agent Workspace

One screen carrying the customer’s full history, related tickets, canned responses and internal notes, so an agent isn’t searching four systems mid-call.

  • Customer history
  • Canned replies
  • Internal notes
  • Merge

Escalation & Approvals

Tiered escalation with named owners, management visibility on ageing tickets, and approval gates for goodwill credits or compensation.

  • Tier 1 / 2 / 3
  • Ageing view
  • Goodwill approval
  • Ownership

Root Cause & Quality

Mandatory cause coding at closure, Pareto analysis of what actually drives volume, and corrective actions tracked through to completion.

  • Cause codes
  • Pareto
  • Corrective actions
  • Recurrence

Feedback & CSAT

Automatic survey on closure, satisfaction and resolution-quality scoring per agent and per category, with reopen rates tracked honestly.

  • CSAT survey
  • Reopen rate
  • Agent scoring
  • Trend

Compliance & Audit

Regulator-format registers, retention rules per category, complete history per ticket, and exports that hold up under inspection.

  • Regulator register
  • Retention
  • Audit export
  • Immutable log

Dashboards & Reports

Volume, backlog, SLA attainment, first-contact resolution, ageing and team performance. Scheduled to the people actually accountable for them.

  • SLA attainment
  • Backlog
  • First contact
  • Ageing
Capabilities

Three things that decide whether a service desk earns its cost

Logging complaints is table stakes. These three are what turn the log into fewer complaints.

Intake

Five channels, one queue, one customer

A complaint that arrives on WhatsApp, then by email, then in person is one ticket rather than three. Channels feed a single queue, duplicates merge against the customer record, and the agent sees everything that person has ever raised on one screen.

Duplicate detection across channels so the same issue doesn’t get three different answers.
Full customer history on the ticket including previous complaints, orders and goodwill given.
Reply on the channel it arrived on without the agent leaving the workspace.
Intake today · all channelsLive
WhatsApp
148
▲ 22 vs average
Email & web form
96
steady
Phone, logged by agent
61
Social & walk-in
24
6 merged as duplicates
329 inbound messages became 311 tickets. 18 merged automatically into existing complaints.
SLA

The clock starts on arrival, not on attention

Every ticket carries a response and a resolution clock set by its category and priority. The clock pauses while you are legitimately waiting on the customer, escalates to a named owner before a breach, and the breach report becomes a fact rather than an argument in a monthly meeting.

Separate response and resolution targets because a fast acknowledgement is not a fix.
Clocks pause on customer wait so your team isn’t penalised for someone else’s delay.
Escalation before the breach to a named person, automatically, at the threshold you set.
SLA board · Tier 2 queue38 open
#4455 · Delivery delay. Resolved in 4 hWithin SLA
#4471 · Billing dispute. 6 h remainingOn track
#4468 · Service outage. 40 min remainingEscalated
#4402 · Refund. Awaiting customer replyClock paused
Root cause

Closing a ticket shouldn’t be the end of it

A ticket cannot be closed without a cause code. That single requirement changes what the reporting is for. You stop reading a list of individual complaints and start reading the three upstream problems generating a third of them.

Cause coding is mandatory at closure and the list is yours, not a generic taxonomy.
Pareto reporting turns thousands of tickets into a handful of fixable problems.
Corrective actions tracked to completion with recurrence measured after the fix, not assumed.
Complaint volume by root causeLast 90 days · 2,840 tickets
Billing system rounding error884 tickets
Delivery partner. Region 3612 tickets
Unclear tariff at renewal410 tickets
Everything else. 41 causes934 tickets
Top three causes account for 67% of volume2 corrective actions in progress
What changes

The queue stops being a treadmill and starts being a diagnosis.

Four changes service managers report first, measured against the same desk a quarter earlier.

Five channels, five queues
Five channels, one queue
The same customer complaining three ways becomes one ticket with one owner.
Urgency depends on who reads it
Urgency set by category
SLA clocks run from arrival and escalate before a breach, not after one.
Tickets closed, causes unknown
Closure requires a cause
Volume becomes a Pareto chart of upstream problems you can actually fix.
Audit assembled from inboxes
Audit is a single export
Every message, action and approval sitting on one immutable ticket record.
Rollout

How a service desk goes live

We start with three months of your real complaints, because the category tree written from them is worth more than one written in a workshop.

1

Complaint audit

We review the last three months of complaints wherever they currently live, and work out what people are genuinely complaining about.

3 to 5 days
2

Categories, SLAs & routing

Category tree, priority matrix, SLA targets, escalation tiers and routing rules agreed and written down before anything is built.

1 week
3

Channels & configuration

Email, WhatsApp, web form, social and phone logging connected; agent workspace, response templates and surveys configured.

2 to 3 weeks
4

Pilot team

One team runs live on real complaints while SLA targets and routing rules are tuned against reality rather than assumption.

2 weeks
5

Rollout & reporting

All teams live, management dashboards switched on, and corrective action tracking started against your top causes.

Ongoing

Typical timeline: 4 to 7 weeks. The category tree and the SLA matrix take the most discussion, and they are exactly what determines whether the reporting is worth reading afterwards.

Who it’s for

Configured for what a late reply actually costs you

A regulator’s deadline, a licence condition and a lost contract are three very different kinds of pressure.

Banks & Financial Services

Regulator-format complaint registers, mandatory turnaround times, and evidence that stands up during an inspection.

Telecom & Utilities

High volume across every channel, outage-driven ticket surges, and SLA reporting against a licence condition.

Hospitals & Healthcare

Patient complaints and incident reports handled with the confidentiality and escalation the subject matter demands.

Government & Public Sector

Citizen complaints with departmental routing, statutory deadlines and transparency reporting that can be published.

Retail & E-commerce

Order, delivery and refund issues linked to the transaction, with goodwill credits released only under approval.

Service Businesses

Any company where a slow reply costs a contract, and where “we never received it” is not an acceptable answer.

Integrations

Complaints arrive wherever your customers already are

WhatsApp, a shared inbox, your app, a Facebook comment or a phone call. The system meets them there and turns each one into the same tracked ticket.

Ask about a specific integration
WhatsApp Business & SMS Email & shared inboxes Website & mobile app forms Facebook, Instagram & X CRM & customer records Order & billing systems Push & voice notifications Power BI & Excel Regulator reporting formats Documented REST API
Deployment & security

A complaint record is evidence. It should behave like evidence.

Nothing is edited away, retention matches your regulator, and sensitive categories stay with named handlers.

Cloud or on-premise

Hosted by us, on your own cloud account, or inside your network where a regulator requires customer data to stay there.

Role & queue permissions

An agent sees their queue, a supervisor their team. Sensitive categories such as harassment or fraud are restricted to named handlers.

Immutable ticket history

Messages, actions, reassignments and approvals can be appended to but never edited or deleted, so the record survives scrutiny.

Retention & backups

Retention periods set per category to match your regulator, with automated backups and tested restores behind them.

Engagement

Pick the scope. We’ll price it in writing.

Pricing follows agent count, channel count and how much regulator-specific reporting you need, so we quote after reviewing your actual complaint mix.

Essentials

A single support team of up to roughly 15 agents.

Quoted per projectOne-off build + annual support
  • Email, web form and phone-logged intake
  • Categorisation and manual routing
  • Response and resolution SLA clocks
  • Agent workspace with canned replies
  • Standard reports, email support
Request a quote
Most chosen

Growth

Multi-team service desks of roughly 15 to 75 agents.

Quoted per projectPhased delivery, milestone billing
  • Everything in Essentials, plus:
  • WhatsApp, SMS and social channel intake
  • Automatic routing and tiered escalation
  • Root cause coding and Pareto reporting
  • CSAT surveys and agent quality scoring
  • CRM integration and a dedicated project manager
Book a scoping call

Enterprise

Regulated, high-volume or multi-entity operations.

Quoted per projectCustom SLA & roadmap
  • Everything in Growth, plus:
  • Regulator-format registers and statutory reporting
  • Multi-entity and multi-region queue separation
  • Retention policies and legal-hold controls
  • On-premise or private-cloud deployment
  • Priority SLA with a named support engineer
Talk to an architect

You own your complaint records and the licence to your build. No per-ticket charge, so doing your job properly never costs you more.

FAQ

Questions we get on the first call

Yes. WhatsApp Business, SMS, email, web forms, your mobile app and the main social platforms all create tickets in the same queue, and agents reply from the workspace on whichever channel the customer used. Phone complaints are logged by the agent against the same customer record, so nothing sits outside the system.

By you, per category and priority, during the second week of the project. After we have looked at three months of your real complaints. Setting them from actual handling times rather than aspiration is what keeps the reporting credible; targets can be tightened later once the desk is performing.

Three things: closure requires a cause code and a resolution note, customers receive an automatic satisfaction survey, and reopened tickets are tracked against the agent and the original closure. A desk that closes aggressively shows up immediately in the reopen rate rather than looking good on the backlog.

Yes. Regulator-format registers and statutory reports are configured to the specific format your authority requires, with retention periods set per category. Because the ticket history is immutable and complete, an inspection becomes an export rather than an exercise in assembling evidence from inboxes.

Yes. The customer-facing side (messages, surveys, acknowledgements and templates) can run in Urdu, English or both, and agents can work in whichever they prefer. Category names and cause codes are configured in the language your team actually uses day to day.

Yes. Linking to your customer, order or billing records means an agent opens a ticket already knowing who the person is and what they bought, which is usually the single biggest reduction in handling time. We integrate through an API or an agreed data exchange, confirmed during discovery.

The SLA and volume reporting is useful from week one. Root cause reporting needs a few weeks of consistent cause coding before the Pareto chart means anything. Usually by the second month you can see clearly which upstream problems are generating most of your volume.

A hypercare period with the team that built it, through your first full reporting month, and then a support agreement with defined response times. We also review the cause data with you after the first quarter, because that is the point where the corrective actions start to pay for the system.

Next step

Bring us last month’s complaints

Send us a month of real complaints, however they are currently stored. We’ll show you the categories, the SLA picture and the three causes generating most of your volume. In 30 minutes.

    A working desk, not slides. Raise a ticket and watch it escalate
    Written scope and price within 3 working days
    No obligation, and your data is returned or destroyed after the call

Book your service desk demo

We reply within one working day. Prefer to talk now? Call +92 000 0000000